News Hub

Greenfield sugar mills in São Paulo can work, but profitability is brutally sensitive to sugar price, ATR-linked cane cost, FX, and scale. At mid-cycle pricing, a 3M t/year mill can generate roughly R$150–R$200 EBITDA per ton of sugar FOB, while smaller mills hover near break-even and mega-mills win on unit costs and co-gen uplift.

A practical, step-by-step guide to building a greenfield sugar mill in São Paulo, from site selection and licensing to engineering, construction, staffing, and ramp-up. Includes realistic timelines, cost ranges, logistics considerations, and key risk controls.

Brazil’s 2025 sugar story in one report: weather shocks, shifting sugar-ethanol incentives, production momentum, and export flows from cane fields to global ports.

Letters of Credit still dominate trade finance because they solve one thing better than anything else: trust. Learn how LCs work, how they compare to SBLCs, and the best practices to avoid costly mistakes.

The 50% tariff on Brazilian imports in July 2025 wasn’t the opening shot—it was the closer. Publicly, the White House billed it as hardball over “unfair practices.” Privately, it capped a years-long, multi-front squeeze designed to pry Brasília away from Beijing: reciprocal-tariff powers, targeted trade cases, and pressure campaigns that bled from steel to 5G. The tariff itself is on the record; the wider playbook—phantom financing offers, leverage built from crises, and a carrot-and-stick tech strategy—emerges from leaked files and off-the-record briefings. The result? Collateral damage at home and abroad, plus a strategic own goal: rather than isolating Brazil from China, the squeeze hardened Brasília’s hedging instincts and deepened regional skepticism about Washington’s reliability. What looked like a tariff tantrum reads, in full, as a modern shadow war—economic instruments wielded in the open, coercive tactics in the dark—and a case study in how decoupling gambits can boomerang.

When Washington’s tariff wall went up, Brazil’s farm belt felt the tremor first. In Mato Grosso, João Silva’s soy turned into overnight gold as Chinese buyers pivoted away from U.S. supply. The surge is real—but fragile. Brazil is benefiting from trade diversion: soy, corn, and beef bookings swell while steel and aircraft stare at headwinds. A “baseline” U.S. tariff stings less than China’s higher rates, yet the bigger risk is strategic: over-reliance on a single customer and a global slowdown if the spat drags on. Brasília’s play is threefold—negotiate exemptions, keep a calibrated retaliatory stick ready, and sprint on diversification (EU, ASEAN, others). Internally, tax relief and logistics upgrades aim to lock in farm gains without torching consumer prices. Net-net, the shock is bad in the absolute, potentially positive for Brazil in the short run. But João’s wife has a point: windfalls born of geopolitics can disappear as quickly as they arrive. The winners bank cash, hedge exposure, and build markets beyond the current crisis.

The Q4 2025 sugar market looks “cheap” on the screen, with ICE No. 11 near 14.8 c/lb, even as ISO projects a 4.9 MMT global deficit and Brazil runs at record sugar exports. This note explains why the market is mispricing risk and sets out a Brazil-anchored 50/30/20 coverage strategy for protecting 2026 margins.

Refined sugar deals live or die on three things: a sharp CIF, bankable paperwork, and clean compliance. Price is a stack—ICE No.5 basis + freight + insurance—plus a fixed margin “K.” That K pays for ops, docs, risk… and every broker in the chain. Commissions aren’t a magic extra; they live inside the price. Push them up and either your CIF climbs or your netback gets crushed. Contracts should ride on RSA (refined) or SAL (raw) rails, spell out Incoterms 2020 CIF insurance (ICC(C) at 110%), and anchor payment to UCP 600: banks pay on documents, not on how sweet the sugar looks. In practice, keep total commissions lean—low single-digit $/MT is common—and cap the pool in an annex tied to LC proceeds. Know destination realities: China’s TRQ can swing landed cost far more than any $2/MT haggle. Operationally, Brazil excels at raw bulk; bagged refined is slower, riskier, and pricier—so expect a fatter K if you insist on awkward load plans. Ditch “ICC-approved” NCNDA fairy tales, screen intermediaries, and write a bank-executable commission schedule. Do that, and you win tenders on price and get everyone paid without drama.

Exporting can supercharge growth—or blow a hole in your balance sheet. The winners do their homework and paper their deals like pros. This guide strips out the romance and lays out seven rookie mistakes that drain cash fast: skipping market research, trusting unvetted buyers, sloppy paperwork, quoting prices without Incoterms, betting everything on one buyer or country, ignoring compliance and certifications, and shipping without payment protection. For emerging-market founders—from African agribusiness to Latin American SMEs—the fix is simple, not easy: validate demand with hard data, verify counterparties, make your documents bulletproof, price with the right Incoterms and named place, diversify customers and regions, meet the destination’s rules to the letter, and lock down payment (L/Cs, collections, or insured open account). Do this and you’ll avoid the traps that kill first shipments, protect margin, and build a reputation that gets you repeat business. Export smart, not just fast.